Welcome to Day 2 of the FTC ehavioral
Advertising Town Hall. The audience has not waned in number or interest
and it promises to be another day of dialogue, debate and, hopefully,
increased appreciation of advertising-subsidized online content and
services.
The first panel focused on
Disclosures to Consumers: the ways they are currently made, how they’re
being improved, and if consumers read, act on or are even aware of
these notices. To be sure, devising the best mechanisms to provide both
the most meaningful consumer experience as well as maintaining consumer
trust is not an easy task. As was noted today by Martin Abrams,
Executive Director at The Center for Information Policy Leadership,
consumers just do not universally have the time to (or maybe even
interest in) learn more about how their browsing behavior is being used
to deliver more targeted, relevant commercial messages.
So we may never reach all of the
people all of the time with this information, no matter how transparent
and verbose. Rather, he says, we need to identify the role of the
privacy notice itself. What these posted policies do is create a sense
of accountability by defining how you can expect organization is going
to behave and provide the mechanism against which an organization’s
practices can be measured by the appropriate regulatory bodies. That’s
very different than forcing consumers to read notices and police the
market themselves.